Posted on June 28, 2008 by Peter Turney
Some people believe that, “In an ideal world, disagreements would not exist”, and that “‘agreeing to disagree’ is a sign of mutual disrespect and contempt.” Others disagree. I believe that agreeing to disagree is a sign of respect and a practical necessity.
Filed under: Political Science | Tagged: argumentation, cooperation, debate, experimentation, facts, iterated prisoners dilemma, values | 1 Comment »
Posted on January 22, 2007 by Peter Turney
One of my readers has asked me why I do not want to debate with him. This is my reply:
Filed under: Computational Linguistics, Philosophy of Science | Tagged: argumentation, debate, experimentation | 3 Comments »
Posted on January 9, 2007 by Peter Turney
Winston Churchill said, “Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to [...]
Filed under: Philosophy of Science, Political Science | Tagged: democracy, experimentation, government | 3 Comments »