Posted on June 28, 2009 by Peter Turney
If symbols must be grounded in perception, how does this grounding happen? How do we learn to create mappings between language and perception? For example, how does the word “rabbit” get tied to the perception (visual, tactile, whatever) of a rabbit? AI algorithms for assigning textual labels to photographs are not yet able to approach [...]
Filed under: Computational Linguistics, Philosophy of Mind, Semantics | Tagged: analogy, perception, symbol grounding, translation | 3 Comments »
Posted on July 13, 2008 by Peter Turney
I recently read an interesting paper, How Is Meaning Grounded in Dictionary Definitions? The abstract follows:
Meaning cannot be based on dictionary definitions all the way down: at some point the circularity of definitions must be broken in some way, by grounding the meanings of certain words in sensorimotor categories learned from experience or shaped by [...]
Filed under: Computational Linguistics, Philosophy of Mind, Semantics | Tagged: AI, lexicons, perception, symbols | 9 Comments »
Posted on January 29, 2008 by Peter Turney
Here’s an update to my post on the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Lera Boroditsky answered the question, “What have you changed your mind about?” as follows:
I used to think that languages and cultures shape the ways we think. I suspected they shaped the ways we reason and interpret information. But I didn’t think languages could shape [...]
Filed under: Philosophy of Mind, Semantics | Tagged: language, perception, Sapir-Whorf | 6 Comments »
Posted on May 4, 2007 by Peter Turney
There is a view that the meaning of words (more generally, of symbols) must be grounded in sensory perception or in physical interaction with the world (embodiment). If symbols were merely defined in terms of other symbols, then it seems that we would have an infinite regression; we would spin in circles in symbol space, [...]
Filed under: Computational Linguistics, Philosophy of Mind, Semantics | Tagged: AI, perception, symbols, Turing test | 3 Comments »
Posted on February 25, 2007 by Peter Turney
The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis is sometimes expressed as “language determines thought”. This is a fascinating concept, suggesting that speakers of another language might have a view of the world very different from our own. The artificial language Loglan (Logical Language) was originally intended to test the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. The idea was that a logical language [...]
Filed under: Philosophy of Mind, Semantics | Tagged: language, perception, Sapir-Whorf | 4 Comments »
Posted on January 5, 2007 by Peter Turney
An attribute is a characteristic of an entity, whereas a relation is a connection between two or more entities. In logic, we can define an attribute as a predicate with one argument and a relation as a predicate with two or more arguments. The distinction between attributes and relations can be unclear. For example, the [...]
Filed under: Computational Linguistics, Philosophy of Mind, Philosophy of Science, Semantics | Tagged: attributes, perception, relations | 12 Comments »